Hi everyone,
We have installed a brand new cucm 10.5 and we want to use Cisco Webdialer (SOAP) to make call from our CRM.
So it works but we have a 2 or 3 secondes delay that is due to SSO self-test, when making calls
As you can see in the logs, the webdialer take 2 or 3 secondes to find that SSO service is disabled:
2015-01-12 11:18:19,054 DEBUG [http-bio-443-exec-52] webdialer.WebdialerSoapServiceImpl - UserIdwebdialer
2015-01-12 11:18:19,054 DEBUG [http-bio-443-exec-52] webdialer.WebdialerSoapServiceImpl - tokennull
2015-01-12 11:18:19,056 DEBUG [http-bio-443-exec-52] webdialer.WebdialerSoapServiceImpl -
https://172.16.124.100/ssosp/ws/public/singleSignOn
2015-01-12 11:18:19,879 DEBUG [http-bio-443-exec-52] webdialer.WebdialerSoapServiceImpl -
SSO TEST INFERENCE
Is CUCM server 172.16.124.100 SSO enabled ? false
2015-01-12 11:18:19,880 DEBUG [http-bio-443-exec-52] webdialer.WebdialerSoapServiceImpl - This is NONSSO Mode : userid passed, password passed : positive scenario We will return CallResponse with new message
2015-01-12 11:18:19,880 DEBUG [http-bio-443-exec-52] webdialer.WebdialerSoapServiceImpl - prof.getUser()webdialer
2015-01-12 11:18:19,881 DEBUG [http-bio-443-exec-52] webdialer.WebdialerSoapServiceImpl - cred.getUserID()webdialer
2015-01-12 11:18:19,882 DEBUG [http-bio-443-exec-52] webdialer.Credential - tokennull
2015-01-12 11:18:19,882 DEBUG [http-bio-443-exec-52] webdialer.Credential - gettokennull
2015-01-12 11:18:19,883 DEBUG [http-bio-443-exec-52] webdialer.Credential - getPasswordwebdialer
2015-01-12 11:18:19,883 DEBUG [http-bio-443-exec-52] webdialer.Credential - getUserIDwebdialer
2015-01-12 11:18:19,884 DEBUG [http-bio-443-exec-52] webdialer.Credential -
https://172.16.124.100/ssosp/ws/public/singleSignOn
2015-01-12 11:18:20,564 DEBUG [http-bio-443-exec-52] webdialer.Credential -
SSO TEST INFERENCE
Is CUCM server 172.16.124.100 SSO enabled ? false
2015-01-12 11:18:20,688 DEBUG [http-bio-443-exec-52] webdialer.WebdialerSoapServiceImpl -
https://172.16.124.100/ssosp/ws/public/singleSignOn
2015-01-12 11:18:21,393 DEBUG [http-bio-443-exec-52] webdialer.WebdialerSoapServiceImpl -
SSO TEST INFERENCE
Is CUCM server 172.16.124.100 SSO enabled ? false
2015-01-12 11:18:21,394 DEBUG [http-bio-443-exec-52] webdialer.WebdialerSoapServiceImpl - Dial Rule apply:true
2015-01-12 11:18:21,395 DEBUG [http-bio-443-exec-52] webdialer.WebdialerSoapServiceImpl - Dest before:00660431792
2015-01-12 11:18:21,396 DEBUG [http-bio-443-exec-52] webdialer.WebdialerSoapServiceImpl - Dest after:00660431792
2015-01-12 11:18:21,396 DEBUG [http-bio-443-exec-52] webdialer.CTIProvider - openline to make call
2015-01-12 11:18:21,417 DEBUG [http-bio-443-exec-52] webdialer.CTIProvider - com.cisco.ccm.webdialer.CTIProvider@9c5aa3.openLine() - opened device:SEP6899CD844F6E
2015-01-12 11:18:21,418 DEBUG [http-bio-443-exec-52] webdialer.CTIProvider - com.cisco.ccm.webdialer.CTIProvider@9c5aa3.openLine() - opened line:5977on partition on device:SEP6899CD844F6E
2015-01-12 11:18:21,421 DEBUG [(P2-172.16.124.100) EventThread] webdialer.CTIProvider - No thread for this device in HT:SEP6899CD844F6E
2015-01-12 11:18:21,649 DEBUG [http-bio-443-exec-52] webdialer.CTIProvider - com.cisco.ccm.webdialer.CTIProvider@9c5aa3.closeLine() - closed line 5977
2015-01-12 11:18:21,651 DEBUG [http-bio-443-exec-52] webdialer.CTIProvider - com.cisco.ccm.webdialer.CTIProvider@9c5aa3.closeDevice() - closed device SEP6899CD844F6E
2015-01-12 11:18:21,652 DEBUG [http-bio-443-exec-52] webdialer.CTIProvider - com.cisco.ccm.webdialer.CTIProvider@9c5aa3.closeDevice() - Removed device SEP6899CD844F6E from control list
As we are in a call center context, we want to reduce at a minimum value the reactivity of the Webdialer service. Does anyone know i can speed up the makecall so that there is no SSO self-test?
thank you in advance for your help.
regards
Nat
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Hi Nat,
I believe this is a known defect to be fixed in 10.5(1.99995.9).
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Hi Nicholas,
Do you think this fix could already be part of the 10.5(2) ?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Yes, it appears to be fixed in 10.5(2) but I am double-checking with the engineers since a couple dates don't match the way they should. We do have an Engineering Special where it's fixed, if not. I'm including the ES version here for my own reference: 10.5.(1.12016-1)
I'll come back and let you know what I hear from the engineers.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Good news everyone! (Said in my best Professor Farnsworth voice.)
I got confirmation from the engineers that the fix is in 10.5(2).
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Hi Nicholas,
many thanks for your investigation. we will update to 10.5.2 to make some more tests..
regards
Nathaniel
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Comments
0 comments
Please sign in to leave a comment.